|
Post by Hoyas1 on Jan 18, 2011 12:52:13 GMT -5
Do we replace wins with Quality Starts?
|
|
|
Post by harashil on Jan 18, 2011 14:20:22 GMT -5
I would likie to see both catagories if possible. If not, QS gets my vote.
|
|
|
Post by Hoyas1 on Jan 18, 2011 14:51:55 GMT -5
This would be tough - but, I also would go with QS over W if we did not add a categoy
|
|
|
Post by eulogy7 on Jan 18, 2011 19:05:12 GMT -5
If we're voting, then my vote is to keep wins and not add QS.
|
|
|
Post by 25alive on Jan 18, 2011 20:54:03 GMT -5
Wins
|
|
|
Post by d**nedifino on Jan 19, 2011 14:38:57 GMT -5
QS instead of Wins but not both
|
|
|
Post by elrodogg on Jan 19, 2011 18:26:44 GMT -5
Both, if not wins.
|
|
|
Post by 25alive on Jan 19, 2011 20:27:28 GMT -5
Something I thought of today and I think bears considering is that if you with QS then you minimize the value of "middle relievers" even more. QS is a starter only category while ALL pitchers can earn/accumulate wins for your team. Just some food for thought
|
|
|
Post by d**nedifino on Jan 20, 2011 8:01:31 GMT -5
I don't understand the sentiment for having both W and QS. We would have to add a 7th batting category to balance QS as the 7th pitching category. I don't think we should do that. I do understand the sentiment that a W is an integral part of baseball stats. Nevertheless, it is a very weak Fantasy Baseball category. It depends too heavily on luck and outside events that do not accurately measure a SP's performance. Yes, a W can be vultured by a lucky middle reliever throwing to one batter, but is that how you really like to lose a week long fantasy match? The QS stat is Fantasy appropriate because it can be measured, predicted, and can even be given an auction value. It is like HR is to batting. Vote QS!
|
|
|
Post by chows on Jan 20, 2011 15:26:49 GMT -5
Stay with Wins
My answer is influenced by what we do with holds... still trying to find some value for the middle relievers here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2011 13:16:36 GMT -5
I like QS as a category--and I'm of the opinion we could use both, but if not QS is more a personal category and Wins is more of a team category, so I would lean towards QS
And if you dont think Wins is more of a team category then a personal one ask a SP from Pittsburg if he thinks his W-L record would be better if he played for the Yankees.........
|
|